Big Guy on the WyzeCam

Updated 2026-04-09: Almost a decade after I first grabbed a handful of these things, I’m still running Wyze cameras in my house, but my feelings about the brand are more complicated now. I added a “Where I Am With Wyze in 2026” section below, plus a mini-review of the Wyze Palm Lock (which is genuinely my favorite Wyze product right now). The original $20 write-up stays, because it’s a piece of smart home history at this point.

Continuing on with the smart home theme we’ve been running with, I want to talk about a little device that I think is still worth your attention, even if the story around it has gotten messier. The WyzeCam. I first mentioned this back in the Big Guy on Black Friday post after I ordered four of them, and I’ve been a Wyze customer ever since. If you’re deeper into the smart home rabbit hole than just cameras, I also wrote about why Matter over Thread is the protocol that actually matters in 2026, which changed how I think about buying any new smart device.

Let’s start with where we are today, and then I’ll leave the original review below as the time capsule it’s become.

Where I Am With Wyze in 2026

I’m running Wyze Cam v4 units around the house. A few of them, in the places you’d actually expect a guy who works from home to put cameras:

• Over the garage. Classic. Package deliveries, random noises at 2am, the usual.
• Back porch. Mostly to see what the dog is barking at.
• The pantry. And yes, this one has a purpose. It’s my ongoing investigation into which kid is leaving the chip bags open. I love my children. I do not love stale tortilla chips. The pantry cam is my Zapruder film.

The v4 hardware itself is solid. It’s a real step up from the original $20 cam. Sharper image, better low light, faster to wake up. I haven’t had a single v4 unit die on me yet, which is more than I can say for some of the older ones I had.

Here’s where it gets real.

The Alerting Problem

Wyze’s newer alerting is aggressive. Way too aggressive out of the box. When I first set the v4 cameras up, my phone was going off constantly. Every shadow, every headlight, every cat that wandered past the porch. I had to go in and turn it down, and then turn it down again, before it stopped feeling like a slot machine that only paid out in anxiety.

Some of you probably like that level of sensitivity. I don’t. I want a camera to tell me when something actually matters, not to narrate the weather.

The App Frustration

This is the part that’s been wearing on me. The cameras themselves are fine. The app is where my patience is getting spent. Little things pile up. Load times, layouts that change, features moved around, notifications that don’t behave the way I expect. None of it is catastrophic on its own. Together, it’s the kind of thing that makes me open the app, sigh, and close it again.

I’m going to say the quiet part out loud. I’ve been considering moving over to Nest. Not because Wyze’s hardware has failed me, but because the daily experience of living inside the Wyze app has gotten frustrating enough that I’m tempted to pay Google prices just to stop thinking about it.

I haven’t pulled the trigger. Wyze still wins on price, and I have a lot of money and mounting hours already sunk into this ecosystem. But I’m on the fence in a way I wasn’t a year ago, and I think that’s worth saying honestly instead of pretending everything is fine.

If you’re shopping right now and you want a cheap, capable indoor camera, the v4 is still a great answer. If you want something you’re going to live with for five years without thinking about it, I’m not sure I can promise you that anymore.

The Wyze Palm Lock

OK, let’s talk about the Wyze product I’m genuinely happy with. The Wyze Palm Lock.

Quick nerd note on how this thing actually works, because it’s cooler than it sounds. The Wyze Palm Lock uses palm vein recognition. An infrared sensor scans the unique vein pattern underneath the skin of your palm and uses that as your “key.” It’s not reading the lines on your hand like some sci-fi palm reader. It’s reading blood vessels below the surface, which is why it’s hard to spoof and works in weird lighting.

I’ll be honest, I was skeptical. A palm reader on a front door sounds like the kind of feature that exists so the marketing page has something to screenshot. I expected to use it twice and go back to the code pad.

I was wrong. It’s pretty nice.

It reads my hand quickly, it’s worked consistently in different lighting, and it solves the one real annoyance of a keypad lock, which is that you’re standing at your own front door punching in numbers while holding groceries. A quick wave of the palm and you’re in. It feels less gimmicky in practice than it sounds on paper.

A few honest notes:

• It’s a smart lock, so it depends on batteries and a working connection to do its smart-lock things. Plan accordingly.
• Palm vein recognition is the convenience layer. The lock itself still works the normal way, which is what you want.
• If the rest of your Wyze setup is getting under your skin like mine is, know that this product lives a little outside that daily-app frustration. I just use it. It just works.

Of all the Wyze stuff I own, this is the one I’d point at and say “yeah, that’s a good buy.”

---

The Original Review (December 2017)

Everything below is the original post from when the first-generation WyzeCam launched. I’m leaving it intact because it’s weirdly important context. Back then, Wyze was the scrappy $20 underdog that walked into a market full of $200 cameras and flipped the whole table over. That’s why I bought into the brand in the first place, and that’s why I’m still (mostly) here.

The WyzeCam

What if I told you there was a new smart home camera on the market, and this camera shoots video in 1080p, has 2 infrared LEDs, includes a mic and a speaker for 2-way communication, allows continuous recording via an SD card, and provides a rolling 14 days worth of cloud storage for alert videos for free. “Meh,” you would say, “There are tons of those devices available now. But with the cloud storage, what is that thing, 300 bucks?” “No,” I would say, “It’s twenty bucks.”

20 Dollars

You read that right. You could get the original WyzeCam for $19.99 plus shipping. For a first-time smart home buyer, that price point was a jaw-dropper. It was the thing that got a lot of skeptical people (me included) off the sidelines.

The Video

The original WyzeCam takes 1080p video, and you can also record in 720p to save space. Both settings look great, and you can even pinch-to-zoom the video, live or playback. You can also create time lapse videos. I used one to film myself putting together our Sleep Number C4, snapping a picture every 10 seconds.

Night Vision

We had an 8 month old at the time, and one of the things I wanted to use these for was as a baby monitor while the little guy napped. The WyzeCam had really good night vision in complete darkness.

The Audio

One area where the original WyzeCam didn’t quite excel is audio. While watching a video produced by the camera, the audio was so-so and sometimes delayed. Using the speaker to talk through the camera was also hit-or-miss. For 20 bucks, it was good enough.

Storage

The WyzeCam came with a free rolling 14 days of storage for event-triggered videos. You could configure it to record on motion, on sound, or even when it heard a smoke alarm or a carbon monoxide detector. It also had a micro SD card slot for continuous local recording.

Mounting

If you wanted to place the WyzeCam somewhere out of the way, or you wanted to place it upside down, the bottom was magnetic. It came with a metal disk and 3M adhesive so you could put it just about anywhere. If you mounted it upside down, you could flip the video 180 degrees in the app.

Connectivity

The original WyzeCam connected to 802.11 b/g/n WiFi, 2.4GHz only. Back then it didn’t play nice with SmartThings, Google Home, or Alexa at launch. That has since changed, and the ecosystem is a lot more open today than it was in 2017.

Original Pros

• 1080p video that looked really good for the price
• SD card slot for continuous local storage
• Pinch-to-zoom
• Could be mounted just about anywhere indoors
• Twenty bucks

Original Cons

• Audio was lacking
• Very limited smart home integrations at launch
• The app was buggy (some things, it turns out, are eternal)

The Honest 2026 Bottom Line

If you’re coming to this page in 2026 looking for a smart home camera recommendation, here’s where I’ve landed:

Buy a Wyze Cam v4 if: You want real 1080p-plus indoor coverage for cheap, you’re not locked into another ecosystem, and you’re OK tuning the alerting down on day one. The hardware is good.

Look elsewhere if: You want a “set it and forget it for five years” camera, or the app experience is going to make or break it for you. Nest and Ring are more expensive for a reason, and if daily ease of use matters more than price, that premium might be worth it.

The Wyze Palm Lock is the product in the Wyze lineup I feel best about recommending right now, full stop.

I’ll update this post again if I actually make the jump to Nest. Until then, I’m still a Wyze guy, just a slightly grumpier one than I used to be.

Sources

• Wyze Palm Lock product page, wyze.com
• Seamless Smart Home Integration, Wyze blog (supports the “ecosystem is more open today” claim)
• Original WyzeCam launch coverage, 2017 (archived on this blog)
• Personal experience with Wyze Cam v4 and Wyze Palm Lock, 2026

Your Turn

Are you running Wyze cameras at home? Have you made the jump to Nest or Ring and regretted it, or loved it? And most importantly: which camera in your house is catching the most ridiculous footage? Drop a comment and tell me I’m not alone in the pantry-cam thing. If you got anything useful out of this update, share it with a friend who’s shopping for their first smart home camera and trying to figure out if the cheap option is still worth it.